What’s good for Cebu: BRT, LRT or Both?

Like garbage or solid waste, traffic congestion becomes major by-product of Cebu’s urbanization. One of Metro Cebu’s major challenge is how to address the worsening traffic congestion. One good option is to have a mass transport system within the metropolitan area.

Metro Cebu’s traffic demand will continue to experience rapid growth of over three percent towards the next century, says the case study Metropolitan Cebu: The Challenge of Definition and Management by Ruben Mercado of the Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Several other studies recommend the need for a mass transport system in Metro Cebu. But the kind of mass transport system Cebu needs is currently discussed.

Mass transport system is almost synonymous to Light Rail Transit (LRT) or the Metro Rail Transit (MRT). The LRT/MRT system is suggested for Metro Cebu. Cebuanos, upon hearing this, get so excited until the cost of constructing and maintaining it was revealed.

Cebu  City Mayor Tomas Osmena, has been suggesting and pushing Bus Rapid Transit system (BRT). Obviously, Mayor Tommy’s mind is already nailed to BRT although several studies are yet to be done.

There is unsolicited proposal for Cebu Light Rail Transit (LRT) pushed by most of Metro Cebu chief executives and the DOTC. It seems Cebu LRT is coming too close not until Cebu City Mayor Tomas Osmena announced that he still wait until the studies of BRT are done before he can give a stand (recommendation) to LRT project.

Some Cebu leaders considered Mayor Osmena’s action as putting death to LRT.

The talk about BRT and LRT has resurrect once again. It divides people. Many want to see LRT but some argue that Cebu needs BRT.

In October 21 news article, Sun Star Cebu compared the costs of BRT and LRT. The report cited figures from the National Center for Traffic Studies (NCTS).

In every kilometer:

  • BRT costs USD$500,000 to USD$15 million
  • A tram system costs USD$10 million to USD$20 million
  • Light rail, USD$15 million to USD$40 million
  • Urban rail, USD$26 million to USD$60 million
  • Elevated rail, USD$50 million to USD$100 million
  • Metro rail, USD$50 million to USD$320 million

Leylander of My Cebu Photoblog, asked his readers, which system should be used in Cebu, BRT or LRT? As expected his readers have varied opinion. Some favor BRT while many also support LRT system and rant about BRT. One reader commented that BRT is just a glorified/fancy name for “autobus”! … at the beginning it might sound appealing […]  but watch after several years it will just be another bus but this ones an expensive bus!

What makes BRT favorable is its cost. As Leylander noted in his blog, the proposed LRT will cost P28.94 Billion. The proposed BRT will only cost P3.6 Billion. If we try to analyze it, 28.94B might even be enough to put BRT lines in Argao and Carcar.

If BRT is good and LRT is also good, why not have both? Some suggested.

BRT can compliment LRT, Mayor Tomas told reporters. Obviously, both cannot be implemented at a time. But do we really need to spend more? Should Cebuano’s need to spend more when there is less costly solution?

Cebu needs a mass transport system. But we don’t need it to be extravagant.

3 thoughts on “What’s good for Cebu: BRT, LRT or Both?

  1. BRT for me is more wiser than having LRT or MRT. It has almost the same efficiency, and as what the other cities experienced. Plus that 25 billion could be spent into other infrastructures like building sidewalks, parks, schools, libraries and improve the overall physique of the city and maintain it.
    It has the same goals, to minimize traffic congestion, but it can also create a more humane city. What is happening in the Philippines is that we are building city for cars, and not for people.. and that shouldn’t be the case.
    I am really glad that our mayor has the political will to pursue it, people are going to mass rail transit, while the cities on the other side of the world who already have one is gradually shifting to BRT.
    I hope it will be implemented really soon. Good Luck!

  2. i have a suggestion since LRT is more expensive if the railway is longer why not have it just inside the city…so it it will just circulate and move the public faster without riding a hassle jeep that would end up a 30 minute ride..(yes i have experienced that one)and use the BRT going to other city like Lapu-Lapu, mandaue talisay to minimize the traffic going to that places since BRT is more cheaper even if its long road to make….i think we need both to minimize and stop the people using private cars that will only contribute traffic since we already have taxi and jeepney…watcha think?!!?

  3. the objectives of this project is to lesser the traffic and give safety to the people and at the same time for the convenience,.. how come the BRT can solve for the traffic where in we already have too many buses and taxi’s,. cost is not the only reason to stop the proposed Cebu Light Rail Transit (CLRT) maybe its because of politics,..

    we have so many professionals who can do the urban planning,. so we must stop politicians deal with it,..

    politicians serve the public, not serves as engineers,.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s